• Skip to Content
  • Skip to Main Navigation
  • Skip to Search

Indiana University Indiana University IU

Open Search
  • People
  • Research
    • Nicer
  • Education
    • Bioethics Teaching Across Campus
    • Graduate Assistantships
    • Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR)
    • Graduate Education
  • Research Ethics
    • Data and Safety Monitoring For Clinical Research
    • Request a Consult
  • Ethics Resources
    • Bioethics Grand Rounds
    • TREATs Talks
    • Bioethics Blog
    • Reference Center
      • Rough Justice, Wicked Problems Using AI to Decide Who Gets Extremely Expensive Treatments
    • Dr. William S. Silvers Holocaust, Genocide, and Contemporary Bioethics Lectureship
  • Events

Center for Bioethics

  • Home
  • People
  • Research
    • Nicer
  • Education
    • Bioethics Teaching Across Campus
    • Graduate Assistantships
    • Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR)
    • Graduate Education
  • Research Ethics
    • Data and Safety Monitoring For Clinical Research
    • Request a Consult
  • Ethics Resources
    • Bioethics Grand Rounds
    • TREATs Talks
    • Bioethics Blog
    • Reference Center
    • Dr. William S. Silvers Holocaust, Genocide, and Contemporary Bioethics Lectureship
  • Events
  • Search
  • Home
  • Events
  • News from the Center
  • Schwartz and Schmidt news post 9.8.25

Peter Schwartz and Karen Schmidt Publish in Annals of Internal Medicine on Precision Medicine

Tuesday, September 02, 2025

 

NEW RESEARCH:Peter Schwartz, MD, PhD and Karen Schmidt, MSN, RN, recently published an article in the Annals of Internal Medicine that was one of the largest and best designed studies to see if personalized healthcare messaging can affect screening. The study found that personalized risk messages to patients and providers did not significantly increase colorectal cancer screening rates, or affect which tests they chose, compared to generic outreach approaches. In some subgroups, however, the risk information increased use of stool testing, a less invasive approach, rather than colonoscopy.

IMPACT: In the study by the Schwartz research team, personalized risk information had some significant effects, though limited and in only some subgroups of patients.  Although giving patients personalized risk information to guide their screening decisions could be worthwhile, additional study is needed before implementation at scale.

For more details, read the full article here.

Center for Bioethics resources and social media channels

  • IU School of Medicine
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn

Indiana University

Accessibility | College Scorecard | Open to All | Privacy Notice | Copyright © 2026 The Trustees of Indiana University